The tragic death of a 32-year-old programmer in China has ignited a fierce debate over the country’s relentless “996” work culture and the lack of boundaries between professional and personal life. Gao Guanghui, a dedicated IT manager, passed away following a cardiac arrest, but it was the events surrounding his final moments—and the hours following his death—that have left the public in shock.
A Career Cut Short by Overwork
Gao Guanghui was a 32-year-old tech professional based in Guangzhou, known by his family and colleagues for his immense dedication to his craft. However, this dedication came at a steep physical cost. According to reports, Gao had been under immense pressure for months, frequently working late into the night and through his weekends. His wife, Ms. Li, recalled numerous instances where she pleaded with him to come home, only to receive replies that he was “fixing two more bugs” or “handling one last call.”
The programmer’s sense of responsibility often kept him at his desk longer than his peers. As a manager, he felt a duty to lead by example, once telling his wife that he couldn’t leave his team working alone on a weekend while he relaxed at home. This mindset, while noble in spirit, led to a schedule where his latest recorded return from the office in November was just minutes before midnight.
The Fatal Collapse and Hospital Request
The tragedy unfolded on a Saturday while Gao was working from home. Despite it being a weekend, he was logged into the office system to meet four critical departmental deadlines set for the following Monday. During his shift, he began feeling unwell and eventually fainted. Even as he struggled to stand, his commitment to his job remained his primary focus.
In a heartbreaking detail, Gao reportedly asked his wife to bring his laptop to the hospital. He believed his condition was minor and expected to continue working on his tasks from his hospital bed after a quick check-up. Unfortunately, his condition was far more severe than he realized. Medical records later indicated that he suffered from respiratory and cardiac arrest, suspected to be caused by Adams-Stokes syndrome—a condition involving sudden loss of consciousness due to abnormal heart rhythms.
Added to Work Chats While Fighting for Life
Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the incident occurred while doctors were actively performing emergency resuscitation on Gao. At 10:48 am, as he fought for his life, Gao’s phone vibrated with a notification: he had been added to a new WeChat technical work group.
Less than thirty minutes later, while medical staff continued their efforts to save him, a colleague sent a message to the group: “Engineer Gao, please help handle this order.” The digital demands of his profession continued unabated, completely oblivious to the life-and-death struggle occurring on the other side of the screen.
Communication After Death
The lack of awareness regarding Gao’s condition persisted even after he was officially declared dead. Eight hours after his passing, at 9:09 pm, another work-related message arrived on his phone. The text informed him that an inspection had failed and that an “urgent task” required his attention first thing Monday morning.
This stark juxtaposition between a human life ending and the cold, mechanical continuation of corporate demands has sparked outrage across social media. For many, it serves as a grim metaphor for a system where employees are viewed as replaceable components rather than human beings with physical limits.
Seeking Justice and Official Recognition
Following the tragedy, Gao’s family has sought to have his death officially recognized as a work-related injury. This classification is crucial in China for securing compensation and holding employers accountable for excessive overtime. While Gao’s most recent health check in June 2024 had shown a normal electrocardiogram, the family argues that the sustained pressure and lack of rest directly contributed to his sudden cardiac failure.
The application for work-related injury status has been accepted by the local human resources and social security authorities in Guangzhou and is currently under review. The case has renewed calls for stricter enforcement of labor laws in the tech industry, where the “996” schedule (9 am to 9 pm, six days a week) remains a common, albeit illegal, practice. Gao’s story stands as a somber reminder of the hidden costs of the digital age and the urgent need for a healthier balance between work and life.
Also Read: BBL Match 26: Perth Scorchers vs Melbourne Renegades (Jan 7, 2026)